Friday, October 31, 2008

My Two Cents

Something I have been thinking about for awhile came to my attention again recently and I've decided to throw my two-cents in.

I hear a lot of descriptions used to describe churches nowadays: Traditional, Contemporary, Cutting-edge, Mainstream, etc. Throw in buzzwords like "relevant", "seeker", "fundamental" and others and the conversation get even more bizarre. Depending upon who you talk to, the style of worship is either the problem with, or the solution to, the condition of the modern church. It's either, "The messages in these new types of services are watered down", or "People don't respond to the old style anymore".

What a bunch of crap. All of it.

Look, I know that's crass, and I probably have some repenting to do, but I don't think that style is nearly as important as genuineness and focus. I think a lack of those things will kill more churches than whether you sing along to a guitar or an organ. As individuals we need to be genuine, and our churches should be too. Should a healthy church be growing? Sure. But it is by no means a sole indicator of health. When cells divide and grow to form a persons' body (and yes, life begins at conception) that growth is awesome. When a small group of cells grow into a massive tumor, it sucks.

I have friends at churches that would be considered pretty traditional, with some modern praise songs thrown in. At least two of these churches are thriving despite not being "cutting edge". The preachers are...well, preachers, with pretty much everything that you picture when you hear that word. Jacket and tie. Three points and a poem. Guess what? People still come. Why? well, in my opinion it's because they (those churches) are focused on spreading the Gospel message everywhere they can, and they genuinely care about people—especially lost people. I also have friends that are going to great contemporary-style churches that are doing the same thing. The pastors dress however they want and their sermons are anything but traditional. However, in both cases the style of worship is largely irrelevant to the success of the church. When people come in, they are attracted to the mission, purpose, vision, and focus of the church

You know what? Chis Tomlin is a genius. Turns out, so was Fanny Crosby. In my opinion, if you miss either, you have lost a lot.

Please don't get me wrong here. If you can't stand hymns, maybe you should find a church that doesn't sing them. If you don't like modern praise songs, same thing—go somewhere else. Be true to who you are, but allow those churches to do the same, and don't think worse of them for it. By the way, one of my friends at one of those thriving traditional churches said when he first started going there, there were some things size and style-wise that he didn't care for. However, he saw the heart of the church, how "real" they are and how focused they are, and he found an unexpected church home.

God is big enough to have more than one style of church, and one is not better than the other. One of them might just be better for you, and that's ok. The guy reading his King James Bible isn't necessarily any less genuine than the guy that reads The Message.

Sometimes I think we are just focusing on the wrong things. Again, if you want to go to a church where the pastor only stands behind a podium, or one where the pastor rushes around at a frenetic pace, I don't care. Both are fine. But when we think about churches, are we thinking most often of what we like, or what they are doing for God? There is nothing wrong with hymns or praise choruses, electric guitars or pipe organs. Neither is better than the other. But you know, I'm willing to bet that if you find a church that genuinely cares about it's members and it's community, understands that the world desperately needs Jesus and is trying to get the message out that Jesus is the only way to be saved, is actively trying to meet people's needs, and has a vision for what God has called them to do and how they should do it—if you find that church, you will find a healthy, thriving, growing church. And as for the questions of contemporary, traditional, etc.?

You'll probably find it doesn't matter.



3 comments:

The Nassars said...

now here's the blogging Jim we all know and love!!!
Thank you for expressing your feelings about this. I could not have said it any better myself. I have been reading some blogs about how churches are dying because they aren't 'keeping up with technology'. I was frustrated that I couldn't communicate how I disagreed with that without sounding 'anti-contemporary/casual/seeker/relevant church'.
go Jim!

Anonymous said...

Ok, this dissertation deserves a dialogue. Playing off your biology analogy, you are right, the quality of cells are more important that the quantity. Besides, get the quality right and the numbers will grow because you are providing a fertile and healthy environment for reproduction.

The key to healthy churches is very simple. As Pastor Chuck would say WIFE(M). That is the Worship (performing for an audience of one; style optional), Instruction (must be truth based so that real discipleship can occur), Fellowship (caring relationships where people feel they are a part of the whole), Evangelism (need to tell the other beggars where the bread is), and Ministry (they don't care how much you know until they know much you care).

Churches have unprecedented access to technology to facilitate the above. But if the technology becomes the focus to reach people instead of people reaching people, then we miss the point. Last time I checked the Holy Spirit inhabits His people not technology.

We live in a shallow and cynical culture, me included. Our technology is part of the problem. Text messages, IM, email, automated phones, voice mail. I don't really have to communicate with anyone face to face. My youngest son is a casualty of this technology. His mouth barely opens when he talsk and can only get grunts out of him:) Our ability to develop and cultivate real and deep relationships is fading as technology continues to dominate our lives.

Now more than ever, corporate worship is needed to connect the body of Christ, but if there is no personal worship then the corporate stuff will look like any other "production"

We are still feeling our way around a large church. The depths of our relationship are not as deep as I would like, but we will get there, just have to make the effort. But I do see people around me that seem to be excited to be there. So I am excited to see them excited. Bottom line is that people are looking for real relationships in a contemporary context, that is how we are wired. How we get there may look a little different from generation to generation, but as long as the gospel remains the foundation of all of this, then we will be ok.

Anonymous said...

Sorry, I should have signed the last post,

Fred